Discernment

Asking and Commanding

Traditions that agree on almost nothing else have drawn the same line through the unseen world: between asking and commanding. Here is where the line comes from, what happens to those who cross it, and the two doors that carry no debt.

"Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."

After the letter of Jude

Every tradition that takes the unseen world seriously has been chasing, underneath its language, much the same things. People have always wanted love, health, money, safety, and some knowledge of what tomorrow will bring. The old books are not shy about this and neither should we be. The question has never really been what to want. It has been how to reach it, and on whose terms.

On that question, traditions that agree on almost nothing else have drawn the same line. On one side is petition: working with the unseen world by asking, offering, and waiting to be answered. On the other is compulsion: working on the unseen world by technique, name, and force, whether it is willing or not. The fellowship holds this line to be the most important thing a student of any spiritual practice can know. Everything else in this room depends on it.

Three Witnesses to One Line

A Syrian philosopher of the fourth century, the same who wrote the life of Pythagoras that the article How a Tradition Grows quotes, defended the old rites of his world against their critics by drawing exactly this distinction. He called the one path theurgy, the work of the gods: invocation, offering, the patient asking of the higher powers to lift the soul. He called the other goeteia, sorcery: the commanding of spirits by names and techniques, as if they were tools. Theurgy petitions, he said, and sorcery compels, and the two must never be confused.

The rabbis who compiled the Talmud drew the line from another direction. They did not trouble to argue that the spirit raised by the necromancer was imaginary. They forbade raising it anyway. The fault was not that the practice failed. The fault was calling something up on your own authority, by technique, because you had decided it must answer.

And the bishop of Hippo, writing in the fifth century to a Roman world that took gods, spirits, and demons entirely seriously, made the same move. He did not deny the powers. He granted that they were real and great, and argued that for exactly that reason they were dangerous to approach on one's own terms.

A Greek philosopher, the rabbis, and a Latin church father: three traditions with little love for one another, and one question in common. Whose terms govern the encounter?

They Assumed It Worked

The modern instinct is to suppose that when an ancient text forbids magic, divination, or the raising of the dead, it does so because these things are superstition. A second modern instinct supposes that they were forbidden because priests and kings wanted to keep power out of the people's hands. Neither is how the old texts read. Again and again the biblical world and the literature around it assume that the forbidden practices work, and sometimes work far too well.

In the Book of Enoch the fallen Watchers teach humanity a curriculum that reads like a catalogue of courses: the signs of the stars, the course of the moon, charms, the cutting of roots, the working of metals. The book treats every one of them as effective. That is the problem.

In the first book of Samuel, King Saul, on the night before his last battle, goes in disguise to a woman at Endor and asks her to bring up the prophet Samuel, who is dead. Samuel comes up. The woman cries out with a loud voice, as though it had worked better than she expected.

In the Acts of the Apostles, seven sons of a Jewish chief priest named Sceva go about Ephesus casting out spirits with a formula: we adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preaches. A spirit answers them. It speaks, and it knows exactly who Jesus and Paul are. Something was there, and the formula reached it.

In each of these stories the text is not asking whether the practice worked. It is asking who was conscripted, and on what terms.

The Sent and the Unsent

Scripture's messengers have a way of introducing themselves. I am Gabriel, says the angel to the old priest in the temple, that stand in the presence of God, and am sent to speak unto thee. In the book of Tobit, which the desert community copied in at least five manuscripts, the angel Raphael travels in disguise with young Tobias on a long journey, heals his father's eyes, and drives off the demon that has killed seven bridegrooms. At the end he reveals who he is and refuses all thanks: not by any favor of mine, but by the will of our God I came; bless him forever. Now I go up to him that sent me.

The sent ones come by appointment, do what they were commissioned to do, and go. They ask; they never force, because they answer to someone else.

The other kind is described just as consistently. The Watchers of Enoch came down without being sent. Two hundred of them bound themselves by an oath on Mount Hermon, and their leader confessed his fear that the others would leave him to bear the sin alone. Nobody commissioned them. They descended. They did not ask; they took. The unclean spirit of the gospels has no body of its own, and so it borrows one. The old texts picture such beings as having stepped out of the order they were made for, so that their only way back into the world is through someone else's door. They do not ask, because there is no one they answer to.

The first time forbidden knowledge crosses into the human world in the whole tradition, then, it crosses as a trespass. Everything the Watchers taught afterward was real and effective, and all of it came with a sentence attached: bound in darkness until the great day of judgment. The knowledge was forbidden not because it was false but because it came from those who broke in, and it carried their debt.

The Archangel Who Would Not

One of the strangest verses in the Christian scriptures is a single sentence in the short letter of Jude, and it is seldom preached. Michael the archangel, commander of the armies of heaven, is face to face with the devil, disputing over the body of Moses. He does not command him. He does not bind him. He does not pronounce a name against him. He says: the Lord rebuke thee. In the vision of the prophet Zechariah the angel of the Lord says the same words to the accuser standing at the high priest's right hand. The Lord rebuke thee. He refers it upward.

Think what this does to the books of ceremonial magic that have circulated under the name of Solomon since the Middle Ages, every one of which rests on the idea that the right name, the right circle, and the right words will force a spirit to appear and obey. Here is the highest of the created beings declining to do exactly that. If the archangel petitions, the conjurer's command is not so much wicked as absurd. He claims an authority the prince of the angels would not claim.

And then there is the teacher himself. In the garden on the last night, when Peter draws a sword, Jesus tells him to put it away. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? Twelve legions, all the power of heaven, available at a word, and he does not command it. He prays. He asks, and he accepts the answer.

That is the pattern, from the top of the order to the bottom: the other's freedom respected first, and then a willing answer awaited. If that is how it works at the throne, the fellowship sees no reason to think it works differently in a kitchen.

What Befalls the One Who Compels

Go back to Saul. The detail most readers miss is that Saul had himself put the mediums and the wizards out of the land. He wrote the law, and then he broke it in disguise. And listen to the first words out of Samuel's mouth: why hast thou disquieted me, to bring me up? The one compelled objects. Then he gives Saul his answer, and it is this: tomorrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me. Saul dies the next day on Mount Gilboa. The compulsion worked, and the compeller paid.

Go back to the sons of Sceva. Their formula reached the spirit, and the spirit answered: Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? It recognized authority. It did not recognize a formula. The name of Jesus in the mouth of men with no standing to use it was only noise, and the spirit said so. Then the man in whom it dwelt leaped on them, and they fled out of the house naked and wounded. Seven men came to bind a spirit and went home bound.

The law in Deuteronomy calls all such practices an abomination, a word for what offends the order of things. The fellowship reads the verse in the light of these stories: whoever opens a door in order to compel has opened it both ways. Those who spend their lives helping people out of spiritual crisis tell us the same thing in plainer words. Most of those who come to them in trouble went first to someone who promised to compel. Things can be unwound, they say, but it is far better not to wind them. Coercion in the unseen world runs up a debt, and the debt is paid in the only place debts can be paid, which is here, in this life, in time and health and peace, and usually by the one who thought he was in charge.

There is an honest objection, and the fellowship will not pretend it away. Churches have hidden books. Kings have burned people. Knowledge has been locked up by institutions that were frightened of it, and the innocent have suffered for it. All of this is true. But the law in Deuteronomy was not written by a church. It is older than every church and every crown that ever tried to use it, and it was read the same way in Hebrew, in Greek, in Latin, and in English before any institution we know of existed. Its warning does not depend on who has misused it.

Dross

There is a third thing in the old texts, and it is not a being at all. It is what grows on a person who keeps turning away. The prophets call it dross. I will purely purge away thy dross, says the Lord in the first chapter of Isaiah: the scum that forms on silver left too long in the wrong condition, the residue that builds on something good until the good can no longer be seen.

From inside a thick enough layer of dross, nothing talks back. The speech of God has not stopped; the hearer has stopped hearing. Jeremiah says it exactly: their ear is uncircumcised, and they cannot hearken. Very often, when someone writes to the fellowship to say that something has a hold on her, or that she has been cursed, what she describes is dross. And that is good news, because dross comes off, and it comes off while you are still alive.

Every act of forcing adds a layer. Life grows a little more tangled. You grow a little more out of touch, and a little more certain that nothing is listening, which makes the next act of forcing easier, because who is there to object? It is a slope, and people slide down it without ever deciding to. The whole purpose of this page is to help a student stop adding to the layer, and the rest of the fellowship's practice is, in a sense, the slow work of washing it off. The washing in living water that opens the Morning Watch has always meant this.

Two Doors with No Debt Behind Them

What is the alternative? Not silence. Not shutting the door on the whole unseen world and calling it physics. There are two ways of reaching that compel nothing, and they are the two the fellowship teaches.

The first is petition. You ask. You ask God, and the ones he sends, and you leave the asking with them. If an answer comes, and it usually does, it is given, not taken. People call such answers coincidences. The fellowship does not argue with the word.

The second is noticing. You were made with a faculty for perceiving more than your eyes report; call it intuition, or the inner sense, or the still small voice. When you use it, nothing outside you is being summoned and nothing is being channeled. Nobody is being addressed at all. You are only paying attention. It is fallible, and what it shows must be weighed, but it compels no one.

Ask and notice. Those are the two doors with no debt on the other side.

How the Essenes Stood

The historian says that every Essene swore at his entry to keep the names of the angels, and the page on Service and Kindness reflects on that secrecy as a form of reverence. He does not say what they did with the names, and the fellowship will not guess. What the scrolls show is suggestive. The Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice describe the worship of the angels in the heavenly temple, and the community sang them in order to join that worship: not to summon the angels, but to stand with them before the same throne. Among the fragments of the fourth cave are songs that a sage of the community was to sing against the spirits of destruction, and they do not command any spirit by its name. They declare the splendor of God's radiance, and the spirits are frightened by the declaration. It is the archangel's way: the Lord rebuke thee.

The fellowship keeps the same line in its own practice. We do not teach the forces of the Tree of Life as angels to be called upon, as the page on The Modern Essene Gospels explains. We pray, and we sit in silence, and we notice. The next page takes this one rule into a question students ask more than any other in this room: what about the cards?

A student who remembers nothing else from this room should remember this. Ask; never command. The rest usually follows.